-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

23 CFR Part 655

[FHWA Docket No. FHWA- 99 -6575]
RIN 2125-AE71

Revision of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices;
General Provisions, Markings, and Signals

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments to the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD); request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The MUTCD is incorporated by reference in 23 CFR part 655,
subpart F, approved by the Federal Highway Administrator, and
recognized as the national standard for traffic control on all public
roads. The FHWA announced its intent to rewrite and reformat the MUTCD
on January 10, 1992, at 57 FR 1134. The purpose of this rewrite effort
is to reformat the text for clarity of intended meanings, to include
metric dimensions and values for the design and installation of traffic
control devices, and to improve the overall organization and discussion
of the contents in the MUTCD.
This document proposes new text for the MUTCD in Part 1--General
Provisions, Part 3--Markings, and Part 4--Signals. The proposed changes
included herein are intended to expedite traffic, promote uniformity,
improve safety, and incorporate technology advances in traffic control
device application.

DATES: Submit comments on or before June 30, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Signed, written comments should refer to the docket number
that appears at the top of this document and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, U.S. DOT Dockets, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. All comments received will be available for
examination at the above address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring
notification of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed,
stamped postcard.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information regarding the notice
of proposed amendments contact Ms. Linda Brown, Office of
Transportation Operations, Room 3408, (202) 366-2192, or Mr. Raymond
Cuprill, Office of Chief Counsel, Room 4217, (202) 366-0834, Department
of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access

Internet users may access all comments received by the U.S. DOT
Dockets, Room PL-401, by using the universal resource locator (URL):
see ``Addresses'' http:/dms.dot.gov. It is available 24 hours each day,
365 days each year. Please follow the instructions online for more
information and help. An electronic copy of this notice of proposed
amendment may be downloaded using a modem and suitable communications
software from the Government Printing Office's Electronic Bulletin
Board Service at (202) 512-1661. Internet users may reach the Office of
the Federal Register's home page at: http://www.nara.gov/fedreg and the
Government Printing Office's database at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/
nara.
The text for the proposed sections of the MUTCD is available from
the FHWA Office of Transportation Operations (HOTO-1) or from the FHWA
Home Page at the URL: http://www.ohs.fhwa.dot.gov/operations/mutcd.
Please note that the proposed rewrite sections contained in this docket
for the MUTCD Part 1, Part 3, and Part 4 will take approximately 8
weeks from the date of publication before they will be available at
this web site.

Background

The 1988 MUTCD with its revisions are available for inspection and
copying as prescribed in 49 CFR part 7. It may be purchased for $57.00
(Domestic) or $71.25 (Foreign) from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-
7954, Stock No. 650-001-00001-0. This notice is being issued to provide
an opportunity for public comment on the desirability of proposed
amendments to the MUTCD. Based on the comments received and its own
experience, the FHWA may issue a final rule concerning the proposed
changes included in this notice.
The National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD)
has taken the lead in this effort to rewrite and reformat the MUTCD.
The NCUTCD is a national organization of individuals

[[Page 73613]]

from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials (AASHTO), the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE),
the National Association of County Engineers (NACE), the American
Public Works Association (APWA), and other organizations that have
extensive experience in the installation and maintenance of traffic
control devices. The NCUTCD voluntarily assumed the arduous task of
rewriting and reformatting the MUTCD. The NCUTCD proposal is available
from the U.S. DOT Dockets (see address above). Pursuant to 23 CFR part
655, the FHWA is responsible for approval of changes to the MUTCD.
Although the MUTCD will be revised in its entirety, it is being
completed in phases due to the enormous volume of text. The FHWA has
reviewed the NCUTCD's proposals for the MUTCD. The summary of proposed
changes for Parts 3, 4, and 8 was published as Phase 1 of the MUTCD
rewrite effort in a previous notice of proposed amendment dated January
6, 1997, at 62 FR 691. The summary of proposed changes for Parts 1 and
7 was published as phase 2 of the MUTCD rewrite effort in a previous
notice of proposed amendment dated December 5, 1997, at 62 FR 64324.
The summary of proposed changes for Chapters 2A, 2D, 2E, 2F, and 2I was
published as Phase 3 of the MUTCD rewrite effort in a previous notice
of proposed amendment dated June 11, 1998, at 63 FR 31950. The summary
of proposed changes for Chapters 2G--Tourist Oriented Directional
Signs, Chapter 2H--Recreational and Cultural Interest Signs, and Part
9--Traffic Control for Bicycles was published as Phase 4 of the MUTCD
rewrite effort in a previous notice of proposed amendment dated June
24, 1999, at 64 FR 33802. The summary of proposed changes for Chapter
2C--Warning Signs and Part 10--Traffic Control for Highway-Light Rail
Transit Grade Crossings was published as Phase 5 of the MUTCD rewrite
effort in a previous notice of proposed amendment dated June 24, 1999,
at 64 FR 33806. The summary of proposed changes for Chapter 2B--
Regulatory Signs, Part 5--Traffic Control for Low-Volume Rural roads,
and update information for Part 8--Traffic Control at Highway-Rail
Grade Crossings was published as Phase 6 of the MUTCD rewrite effort in
a previous notice of proposed amendment.
The summary of proposed changes for Part 6--Traffic Controls for
Street and Highway Construction, Maintenance, Utility, and Incident
Management Operations will be published as Phase 8 of the MUTCD rewrite
effort in a future notice of proposed amendment. This notice of
proposed amendment is Phase 7 of the MUTCD rewrite effort and includes
the summary of proposed changes for MUTCD Part 1--General Provisions,
Part 3--Markings, and Part 4--Signals.
The proposed new style of the MUTCD would be a 3-ring binder with
8\1/2\ x 11 inch pages. Each part of the MUTCD would be printed
separately in a bound format and then included in the 3-ring binder. If
someone needed to reference information on a specific part of the
MUTCD, it would be easy to remove that individual part from the binder.
The proposed new text would be in column format and contain four
categories as follows: (1) Standards--representing ``shall''
conditions; (2) Guidance--representing ``should'' conditions; (3)
Options--representing ``may'' conditions; and (4) Support--
representing descriptive and/or general information. This new format
would make it easier to distinguish standards, guidance, and optional
conditions for the design, placement, and application of traffic
control devices. The adopted final version of the new MUTCD will be in
metric and English units. Dual units will be shown in the MUTCD
particularly for speed limits, guide sign distances, and other
measurements which the public must read.
The FHWA invites comments on the proposed new text for the MUTCD
Part 1, Part 3, and Part 4. Summaries of the proposed significant
changes contained in these parts are included in the following
discussions:

Discussion of Proposed Amendments to Part 1--General Provisions

The summary of proposed changes for Part 1 was published as Phase 2
of the MUTCD rewrite effort in a previous notice of proposed amendment
dated December 5, 1997. Since that time, several more Phases were
published with additional definitions. The following are the most
significant proposed revisions to Part 1:
1. In Section 1A.11, paragraph 3, the FHWA proposes to include a
flow chart diagram showing the process for changes to the MUTCD and for
experimentation with new traffic control devices and their application.
2. In Section 1A.14, the definitions for the following terms apply
only to Part 4--Signals. Therefore, the FHWA proposes to delete them
from Part 1--General Provisions and discuss them in Part 4 only. The
terms are: actuated operation, actuation, backplate, conflict monitor,
controller assembly, controller unit, coordination, cycle length, dark
mode, detector, flasher, full-actuated operation, interval, interval
sequence, louver, pedestrian change interval, pedestrian clearance
time, pedestrian signal head, permitted mode, preemption control,
priority control, protected mode, ramp control signal, red clearance
interval, signal lens, signal phase, signal section, signal system,
signal visor, signal warrant, steady mode, visibility-limited signal
indication, and yellow change interval. The FHWA proposes to only
include definitions in Part 1A.14 for terms that are used in more than
one specific part of the MUTCD.
3. In Section 1A.14, the FHWA proposes to add the following
definitions which appear in various sections of the MUTCD: Paved--A
bituminous surface treatment, mixed bituminous concrete, or portland
cement concrete roadway surface which has both a structural (weight
bearing) and a sealing purpose for the roadway. Rural--A type of
roadway as defined by the jurisdictions in compliance with their
legislation, statute, regulations, and policies. Urban--A type of
roadway as defined by the jurisdictions in compliance with their
legislation, statute, regulations, and policies.
4. The FHWA proposes to add a new Section 1A.15 entitled,
``Abbreviations.'' This section will list the standard abbreviations
for word messages used in connection with traffic control devices.

Discussion of Proposed Amendments to Part 3--Markings

The summary of proposed changes for part 3 was published as Phase 1
of the MUTCD rewrite effort in a previous notice of proposed amendment
dated January 6, 1997. Since that time, a number of changes have been
suggested to FHWA by the NCUTCD and others, and a number of applicable
recommendations were made in the ``Older Driver Highway Design
Handbook.'' <SUP>1</SUP> Section numbers used herein refer to the
proposed text in the notice of proposed amendments dated January 6,
1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ ``Older Driver Highway Design Handbook,'' Report No. FHWA-
RD- 99 -045, available from the FHWA Research and Technology Report
Center, 9701 Philadelphia Court, Unit Q, Lanham, Maryland 20706.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The FHWA has included Sections 3B.1, 3B.2, and 3B.3 in this notice
so that those reviewing the following part 3 sections are aware of the
Final Rule wording of these sections with regards to center lines and
edge lines.
1. In Section 3B.2, the FHWA proposes to add a standard, which was
inadvertently omitted from the proposed amendment dated January 6,

[[Page 73614]]

1997, at 62 FR 691. The standard is that lane line markings shall be
used on all Interstate highways and freeways.
2. In Section 3B.4, paragraph 2, the FHWA proposes to add Figure 3-
9a to show more examples of using dotted line markings in intersections
to extend longitudinal line markings. This proposed Figure is in
response to older driver research that shows that motorists may benefit
by having these additional markings.
3. In Section 3B.9, paragraphs 2, 4, and 6, the FHWA proposes to
add a ``Yield Line'' marking as an optional marking where it is
important to indicate the point behind which vehicles are required to
yield. The proposed Figure 3-24 provides an illustration of these
markings.
4. In Section 3B.12, paragraph 19, the FHWA proposes to add a
``Yield Ahead'' triangle symbol marking for optional use in advance of
intersections where approaching traffic will encounter a YIELD sign.
The proposed Figure 3-25 provides an illustration of these markings.
5. In Section 3B.13, the FHWA proposes to differentiate between
types of preferential lanes. The diamond pavement marking symbol is
proposed for exclusive HOV lane use. In situations where a preferential
lane is not an HOV lane, then the word message (Bus, Taxi, etc.) or
symbol (Bike, etc.) for the type of traffic allowed would be used.
6. In Section 3B.15, paragraph 5, the FHWA proposes to add ``paved
median noses'' to the locations that should have retroreflective solid
yellow markings. This addition is in response to recommendations
contained in the ``Older Driver Highway Design Handbook'' (see footnote
1) which shows that motorists may benefit by having these additional
markings.
7. The FHWA proposes to add a new Section 3B.16 to provide
standards for the longitudinal lane line markings for the various types
of physically separated, reversible, non-reversible, and left and right
side concurrent flow preferential lanes for motorized vehicles. The
proposed Figure 3-23 provides an illustration of these markings.
Furthermore, there is guidance on marking the neutral area between a
preferential use lane and a regular traffic lane when the distance
between them is greater than 1.2 m (4 ft).
8. The FHWA proposes to add a new Section 3B.17 to incorporate
standard markings for roundabouts since roundabouts are becoming more
commonly used. The proposed Figure 3-26 provides an illustration of
typical roundabout markings.
9. The FHWA proposes to add a new Section 3B.18 to incorporate
optional standard markings for other circular intersections including
rotaries, traffic circles, and residential traffic calming designs. The
proposed Figure 3-26a provides an illustration of typical markings for
other circular intersections.
10. The FHWA proposes to add a new Section 3B.19 to provide
pavement markings to assist motorists in identifying the locations of
speed humps. The proposed Figure 3-27 and Figure 3-28 provide
illustrations of typical speed hump markings.
11. The FHWA proposes to add a new Section 3B.20 to provide for
pavement markings in advance of a speed hump where added visibility is
desired or where a speed hump may not be expected. The proposed Figure
3-29 provides an illustration of a typical advanced speed hump marking.

Discussion of Proposed Amendments to Part 4--Signals

The summary of proposed changes for Part 4 was published as Phase 1
of the MUTCD rewrite effort in a previous notice of proposed amendment
dated January 6, 1997. Since that time, a number of changes have been
suggested to FHWA, and a number of applicable recommendations were made
in the ``Older Driver Highway Design Handbook'' (see footnote 1).
Section numbers used herein refer to the proposed text in the notice of
proposed amendments dated January 6, 1997.
1. The FHWA proposes to change the name of Section 4B.2 to ``Basis
of Installation or Removal of Traffic Control Signals'' to reflect that
the section addresses both the installation and removal of traffic
control signals. Under OPTION, a series of steps that may be considered
in removing a traffic control signal is proposed.
2. In Section 4C.1, paragraph 12, the category OPTION is added and
a new paragraph (d) is proposed for the various data that may be
included in the engineering study for determining whether a traffic
control signal is needed: ``Information about nearby facilities and
activity centers that serve the elderly, people with disabilities, and/
or requests from people with disabilities for accessible crossing
improvements along this route. These people may not be adequately
reflected in the pedestrian volume count if the lack of a signal
restrains their mobility.'' The FHWA is withdrawing the proposal that
was made in the January 6, 1997, notice of proposed amendments to move
the School Crossing Warrant from Part 4 to Section 7D.4. (See 62 FR
691, FHWA Docket No. 96-47 scanned into DOT's Document Management
System as Docket No. 97-2295.) The FHWA proposes to keep it as Warrant
5 in Section 4C.1. However, the FHWA proposes to include a reference in
Chapter 7D.
3. In Section 4D.3, paragraph 3, a new GUIDANCE is proposed:
``Safety considerations should include the installation, where
appropriate, of accessible pedestrian signals that provide information
in nonvisual format (including audible tones, verbal messages, and/or
vibrotactile information). Provisions for accessible signals are
presented in Sections 4E.6 and 4E.8.'' This proposed change reflects
the intent of language on Bicycle Transportation and Pedestrian
Walkways contained in section 1202 of the Transportation Equity Act for
the 21st Century, Public Law 105-178, 112 Stat. 107 (1998).
4. In Section 4D.4, paragraph 2, the FHWA is withdrawing its
proposal (See 62 FR 691, FHWA Docket No. 96-47 scanned into DOT's
Document Management System as Docket No. 97-2295) to delete the phrase
``Unless otherwise determined by law'' relative to the meaning of
signal indications. The FHWA proposes to keep this statement because it
encourages State and local entities to achieve uniform rules of the
road that are in accord with Chapter 11, Rules of the Road, in the
``Uniform Vehicle Code and Model Traffic Ordinance,'' (UVCMTO), Revised
1992, published by the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and
Ordinances in Evanston, Illinois.
5. In Section 4D.4, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraph 2c(1),
paragraph 2, to delete the words, ``or a RED ARROW indication is
displayed.'' This proposed deletion is in response to recommendations
contained in the ``Older Driver Highway Design Handbook'' (see footnote
1) which shows motorist confusion as to the meaning of the red arrow
indication. In Figure 4-7 in Section 4D.16, the typical arrangement of
lenses c and d are appropriately changed to eliminate the RED ARROW and
to replace it with the CIRCULAR RED.
6. The FHWA proposes to delete Section 4D.4, paragraph 2c(2). This
proposed deletion is in response to recommendations contained in the
``Older Driver Highway Design Handbook'' (see footnote 1) which shows
motorist confusion as to the meaning of the red arrow indication.
7. In Section 4D.4, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraph 2c(3) to

[[Page 73615]]

delete ``or RED ARROW.'' This proposed deletion is in response to
recommendations contained in the ``Older Driver Highway Design
Handbook'' (see footnote 1) which shows motorist confusion as to the
meaning of the red arrow indication.
8. In Section 4D.4, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraph 2d(3) to
delete ``Flashing RED ARROW and.'' This proposed deletion is in
response to recommendations contained in the ``Older Driver Highway
Design Handbook'' (see footnote 1) which shows motorist confusion as to
the meaning of the red arrow indication.
9. In Section 4D.5, the FHWA proposes to delete paragraph 3(d) that
reads, ``A steady RED ARROW indication shall be displayed when it is
intended to prohibit traffic, except pedestrians directed by a
pedestrian signal head, from entering the intersection or other
controlled area to make the indicated turn. Turning on a steady RED
ARROW indication shall not be permitted.'' This deletion would require
a CIRCULAR RED signal indication to be used instead of a RED ARROW for
right and left-turn indications. This is in response to recommendations
contained in the ``Older Driver Highway Design Handbook'' (see footnote
1) which shows motorist confusion as to the meaning of the red arrow
indication. The compliance date proposed by FHWA for this change is 3
years after the effective date of the final rule. This would allow
State and local agencies time to implement this proposed change.
10. The FHWA proposes to delete Section 4D.5, paragraph 3(e)(2)
that reads, ``Shall not be displayed in conjunction with the change
from a RED ARROW indication to a GREEN ARROW indication.'' This would
delete the reference to the RED ARROW since the FHWA proposes to no
longer use RED ARROWS in the MUTCD.
11. In Section 4D.5, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraph 3(e)(4)
to read, ``Shall be terminated by a CIRCULAR YELLOW indication or a
CIRCULAR RED indication except.'' This would delete the reference to
the RED ARROW since the FHWA proposes to no longer use RED ARROWS in
the MUTCD.
12. In Section 4D.5, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraph 4,
OPTION, to delete the words, ``RED ARROW.'' This would delete the
reference to the RED ARROW since the FHWA proposes to no longer use RED
ARROWS in the MUTCD.
13. In Section 4D.6, paragraph 2, the FHWA proposes to add a new
STANDARD which defines a leading protected-only left turn phase as one
in which the GREEN ARROW, YELLOW ARROW, and CIRCULAR RED is given to
vehicles turning left from a particular street before the CIRCULAR
GREEN indication is given to the through movement on the same street.
This proposed addition to the MUTCD is currently used in the field and
is recommended in the ``Older Driver Highway Design Handbook'' (see
footnote 1).
14. In Section 4D.6, paragraph 3, the FHWA proposes to add a new
OPTION to read, ``A leading protected-only left turn phase may be
considered if there is not a sufficient number of acceptable gaps for
the left-turning movement.'' This proposed addition to the MUTCD is
based on recommendations contained in the ``Older Driver Highway Design
Handbook'' (see footnote 1) which shows a crash reduction with the use
of a leading protected-only left-turn phase.
15. In Section 4D.6, the FHWA proposes to delete paragraph 2b(1)
which reads, ``RED, YELLOW, and GREEN left-turn ARROW indications only.
Only one of the three lenses shall be illuminated at any given time. A
signal instruction sign shall not be required with this set of signal
indications. If used, it shall be a LEFT ON GREEN ARROW ONLY sign (R10-
5) or.'' This deletion would require a CIRCULAR RED signal indication
to be used instead of a RED ARROW for left-turn indications. This is in
response to recommendations contained in the ``Older Driver Highway
Design Handbook'' (see footnote 1) that shows confusion as to the
meaning of the red arrow indication. The compliance date for this
change is proposed to be 3 years after the effective date of the final
rule. This would allow State and local agencies time to implement this
proposed change.
16. In Section 4D.7, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraph 2(a) to
replace ``RED ARROW'' with ``CIRCULAR RED,'' and add ``along with a
RIGHT TURN SIGNAL sign, R10-10'' at the end of the sentence. This would
delete the reference to the RED ARROW since the FHWA proposes to no
longer use RED ARROWS in the MUTCD.
17. In Section 4D.7, the FHWA proposes to delete paragraph 2 (1)
that reads, ``RED, YELLOW, and GREEN right-turn ARROW indications only.
One of the three lenses shall be illuminated at any given time. A
signal instruction sign shall not be required with this set of signal
indications. If used, it shall be a RIGHT ON GREEN ARROW ONLY sign
(R10-5a); or.'' The purpose of this proposed change is to require a
CIRCULAR RED instead of a RED ARROW for right-turn indications.
18. In Section 4D.8, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraph 3 to no
longer allow the display of red arrows on any signal face. The
compliance date for this change is proposed to be 3 years after the
effective date of the final rule. This would allow State and local
agencies time to implement this proposed change.
19. In Section 4D.11, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraphs 3 (b)
and 3 (c) to delete the reference to red arrows.
20. In Sections 4D.15 and 4D.17, the FHWA proposes to revise these
sections to be consistent with a new maximum vertical viewing angle of
20 degrees. In Section 4D.15, paragraph 1d (2) and Section 4D.17, new
paragraph 5, the FHWA proposes to require a maximum height of 7.8 m
(25.6 ft) to the top of signal housings mounted above the pavement with
a sliding scale of 6.4 m to 7.8 m (21 to 25.6 ft) maximum height for
viewing distances between 12 m and 16 m (40 and 53 ft). Vertical
viewing angles of as high as 23.8 degrees are implicitly allowed via
the present wording of the MUTCD. This has been identified as a problem
area. Ergonomic statistics demonstrated that tall motorists, with these
extreme vertical angle placements, are unable to view the top of the
signal face due to the blockage from the vehicle ceiling line.
Therefore the FHWA proposes a maximum vertical viewing angle of 20
degrees.
21. In Section 4D.16, the FHWA proposes to revise paragraph 9 (a)
and (b) to delete the words, ``Left-turn RED ARROW,'' and ``Right-turn
RED ARROW.'' This would delete the reference to the RED ARROW since
FHWA proposes to no longer display red arrows on any signal face.
22. In Section 4D.16, the FHWA proposes to insert a new paragraph
15 at the end of the section to provide supporting information for 300
mm (12-in) signals. The new paragraph will read, ``The use of 300 mm
(12-in) lenses or higher intensity 200 mm (8-in) lenses can be used to
assist older drivers in decisionmaking tasks further from the
intersection where traffic density is lower and there are fewer
potential conflicts with other vehicles.'' The FHWA believes this
proposed change will assist older drivers in the decisionmaking tasks
encountered at roadway intersections.
23. In Section 4D.17, the FHWA proposes to add a new paragraph 16
to explain the benefits of using a backplate on signals. The FHWA
believes the use of a backplate will help older drivers and enhance the
signal conspicuity.

[[Page 73616]]

24. In Section 4E.4, paragraph 8, the FHWA proposes to revise the
GUIDANCE as follows: ``For crosswalks where the pedestrian enters the
crosswalk more than 30 m (100 ft) from the pedestrian signal head
indications, the symbols should be at least 225 mm (9 in) high.'' The
MUTCD presently provides that where the pedestrian enters the crosswalk
more than 20 m (60 ft) from the pedestrian signal head indication, the
pedestrian symbols should be at least 225 mm (9 in) high. However
research has found that the lesser, 150 mm (6 in) pedestrian symbols,
are adequate for distances of up to 30 m (100 ft). The subjects used in
the research included 48 seniors age 62 and older. The research
included incandescent, light emitting diode (LED) and Fiber-optic
pedestrian signals.
25. The FHWA proposes to add a new Section 4E.6, Accessible
Pedestrian Signals and a new Section 4E.8, Accessible Pedestrian
Detectors. In these new sections SUPPORT information would be provided
on the primary techniques that pedestrians who have visual disabilities
use to cross the street at signalized intersections. Information would
also be provided on the availability of local organizations that can
act as advisors to engineers when consideration is being given to the
installation of accessible pedestrian signals. GUIDANCE would be
provided on factors to consider in the engineering study to decide
whether to install an accessible pedestrian signal. Finally, STANDARDS
and GUIDANCE would be provided for such installations (if used). These
would be useful to engineers in designing installations, to suppliers
by providing a degree of standardization for these devices, and to
pedestrians who have visual disabilities in assuring that their needs
are met and that installations of accessible pedestrian signals are
standardized. Based on this change, the section numbers for 4E.6,
Pedestrian Signal Timing, would be renumbered as Section 4E.7. Section
4E.7, Pedestrian Intervals and Phases, would be renumbered as Section
4E.9.
26. In redesignated Section 4E.9 (formerly 4E.7), paragraph 4, the
FHWA proposes to revise the GUIDANCE to change the WALK interval from a
range of 4 to 7 seconds to a minimum of 7 seconds. In paragraph 9, the
FHWA proposes to include an OPTION that if pedestrian volumes and
characteristics do not require a 7-second WALK interval, a WALK
interval as short as 4 seconds may be used.
27. In redesignated Section 4E.9 (formerly 4E.7), paragraph 6, the
FHWA proposes an OPTION that allows the use of new technology for
pedestrian detection as an alternative to using lower walking speeds
for slower pedestrians. There has been a successful experiment in
Portland, Oregon, on the use of passive methods to detect pedestrians
in the crosswalk.<SUP>2</SUP> Such equipment can detect pedestrians
that need more time to complete their crossing. The equipment extends
the length of the pedestrian clearance time (flashing DON'T WALK) for
that cycle to allow pedestrians to complete their crossing before cross
traffic begins.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ Kloos, W., ``Implementing Passive Methods for Detecting
Pedestrians,'' presentation at the 1998 Annual Meeting, Institute of
Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

28. In Section 4J.3, paragraph 1, the FHWA proposes to increase the
minimum height and width dimensions of each DOWNWARD GREEN ARROW,
YELLOW X, and RED X signal face from 300 mm (12 in) to 450 mm (18 in).
The FHWA believes this proposed change will ensure that these critical
signals are adequately conspicuous to capture the drivers' attention.
The FHWA is also including an OPTION to use 300 mm (12 in) lane-use
control signal faces in areas having minimal visual clutter and having
speeds of 70 km/h (45 mph) or less.
29. The FHWA proposes to add a new Section 4L, In-Roadway Lights,
to the MUTCD. In-Roadway Lights are special types of highway traffic
signals. They consist of a series of flashing light units embedded
across the roadway to warn road users that they are approaching a
condition on or adjacent to the roadway that might not be readily
apparent and might require the road users to slow down and possibly
come to a stop. These conditions include, but are not limited to,
marked crosswalks that are not controlled by STOP signs, YIELD signs,
or traffic control signals.
30. The proposed new Sections 4L.1 and 4L.2 would provide STANDARDS
and GUIDANCE for the design and operation of In-Roadway Lights (if
used) installations. The STANDARDS, among other things, would provide:
(1) For the installation of In-Roadway Lights parallel to the edge of
the crosswalk, (2) For the operation to be initiated based on
pedestrian actuation (active or passive), (3) For the operation to
cease at a predetermined time after the actuation or with passive
detection when the pedestrian clears the crosswalk, (4) For the
installation at marked crosswalks only with applicable warning signs,
and (5) For the height of the In-Roadway Lights not to exceed a height
of 20 mm (3/4 in).

Rulemaking Analysis and Notices

All comments received before the close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above will be considered and will be available
for examination in the docket at the above address. Comments received
after the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and will be
considered to the extent practicable, but the FHWA may issue a final
rule at any time after the close of the comment period. In addition to
late comments, the FHWA will also continue to file in the docket
relevant information that becomes available after the comment closing
date, and interested persons should continue to examine the docket for
new material.

Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures

The FHWA has determined preliminarily that this action will not be
a significant regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order
12866 or significant within the meaning of Department of Transportation
regulatory policies and procedures. It is anticipated that the economic
impact of this rulemaking would be minimal. The new standards and other
changes proposed in this notice are intended to improve traffic
operations and safety, and provide additional guidance, clarification,
and optional applications for traffic control devices. The FHWA expects
that these proposed changes will create uniformity and enhance safety
and mobility at little additional expense to public agencies or the
motoring public. Therefore, a full regulatory evaluation is not
required.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), the FHWA has evaluated the effects of this proposed action on
small entities. This notice of proposed rulemaking adds some new and
alternative traffic control devices and traffic control device
applications. The proposed new standards and other changes are intended
to improve traffic operations and safety, expand guidance, and clarify
application of traffic control devices. The FHWA hereby certifies that
these proposed revisions would not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

This proposed rule would not impose a Federal mandate resulting in
the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the

[[Page 73617]]

private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year (2 U.S.C.
1532).

Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

This proposed action has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 dated August
4, 1999, and it has been determined that it would not have a
substantial direct effect or sufficient federalism implications on
States that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States.
Nothing in this document directly preempts any State law or regulation.

Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This proposed action does not contain a collection of information
requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)

This proposed action meets applicable standards in Sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)

The FHWA has analyzed this proposed action under Executive Order
13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks. This is not an economically significant action and does
not concern an environmental risk to health or safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)

This proposed action would not effect a taking of private property
or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

National Environmental Policy Act

The agency has analyzed this proposed action for the purpose of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
has determined that it would not have any effect on the quality of the
environment.

Regulation Identification Number

A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.

List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 655

Design standards, Grant programs--transportation, Highways and
roads, Incorporation by reference, Signs, Traffic regulations.
(23 U.S.C. 109(d), 114(a), 315, and 402(a); 23 CFR 1.32; 49 CFR
1.48)

Issued on: December 17, 1999.
Kenneth R. Wykle,
Administrator.
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Introduction

Standard
Traffic control devices are all signs, signals, markings, and other
devices used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over or
adjacent to a street, highway, pedestrain facility, or bikeway by
authority of a public body or official having jurisdiction.
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is
incorporated by reference in 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
Parts 655, Subpart F and recognized as the national standard for
traffic control devices on all roads open to public travel. The
policies and procedures of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to
obtain basic uniformity of traffic control devices are described in 23
CFR 655, Subpart F.
Support:
The need for uniform standards was recognized long ago. The
American Association of State and Highway Officials (AASHO), now know
as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials (AASHO) published a manual for rural highways in 1927 and the
National Conference on Street and Highway Safety (NCSHS) published a
manual for urban streets in 1930. In the early years, the necessity for
unification of the standards applicable to the different classes of
road and street systems was obvious. To meet this need, a joint
committee of AASHO and NCHSH developed, and published in 1935, the
original edition of this Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). That committee, now called the National Committee on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (NCUTDC), though changed from time to time in
name, organization and personnel, has been in continuous existence and
has contributed to periodic revisions of the Manual. The FHWA has
administered the MUTCD since the 1971 edition. The FHWA and its
predecessor organizations have participated in the development and
publishing of the previous editions. There were seven previous editions
of the MUTCD and several additions were revised one or more times.
Table I-1 traces the evolution of the MUTCD, including two manuals
developed by AASHO and NCSHS.
The Secretary if Transportation, under authority granted by
legislation in 1966, decreed that traffic control devices on all roads
in each State shall be in substantial conformance with the standards
issued or endorsed by FHWA.
23 CFR, Part 655.603 adopts the MUTCD as the national standard for
any street, highway, or bicycle trail open to public travel. The
Uniform Vehicle Code (UVC) is one of the referenced documents contained
in the MUTCD. The UVC contains a model set of motor vehicle and traffic
laws for use throughout the Nation. As with the MUTCD, the UVC also
includes language in Section 15-117 which states that, ``No person
shall install or maintain in any area of private property used by the
public any sign, signal, marking or other device intended to regulate,
warn or guide traffic unless it conforms with the State manual and
specifications adopted under Section 15-104.'' Section 15-104 of the
UVC adopts the MUTCD as the standard for conformance.

[[Page 73618]]

Evolution of the MUTCD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Month/year
Year Name revised
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1927.......................... Manual and 4/29, 12/31
Specifications for
the Manufacture,
Display, and Erection
of U.S. Standard Road
Markers and Signs
(for rural roads).
1930.......................... Manual on Street No revisions
Traffic Signs,
Signals, and Markings
(for urban streets).
1935.......................... Manual on Uniform 2/39
Traffic Control
Devices for streets
and Highway (MUTCD).
1942.......................... MUTCD--War Emergency No revisions
Edition.
1948.......................... MUTCD................. 9/54
1961.......................... MUTCD................. No revisions
1971.......................... MUTCD................. 11/71, 4/72, 3/
73, 10/73, 6/
74, 6/75, 9/76,
12/77
1978.......................... MUTCD................. 12/79, 12/83, 9/
84, 3/86
1988.......................... MUTCD................. 1/90, 3/92, 9/
93, 11/94, 12/
96, 6/98, 6/ 99
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table I-1, Evolution of the MUTCD

Part 1. General Provisions

1A.1 Purpose of Traffic Control Devices

Support:
The purpose of traffic control devices and principles for their use
is to promote highway safety and efficiency by providing for the
orderly movement of all road users on streets and highways throughout
the nation.
Traffic control devices notify road users of regulations and
provide warning and guidance needed for the safe, uniform, and
efficient operation of all elements of the traffic stream.
Standard:
Traffic control devices or their supports shall not bear any
advertising message or any other message that is not related to traffic
control.

1A.2 Principles of Traffic Control Devices

Support:
This Manual contains the basic principles that govern the design
and use of traffic control devices for all streets and highways open to
public travel regardless of type or class or the governmental body
having jurisdiction. The text specifies the restriction on the use of a
device if it is intended for limited application or for a specific
system. It is important that these principles be given primary
consideration in the selection and application of each device.
Guidance:
To be effective, a traffic control device should meet five basic
requirements:
1. Fulfill a need.
2. Command attention.
3. Convey a clear, simple meaning.
4. Command respect from road users.
5. Give adequate time for proper response.
The following aspects of traffic control devices should be
considered to ensure that these requirements are met: design; placement
and operation; maintenance; and uniformity.
Support:
The term speed can mean the 85th percentile, design, average,
operating, posted or statutory speed. The definitions of these and
other specified speed terms are contained in Section 1A.14, Definition
of Words and Phrases.
Guidance:
The policies and procedures of the FHWA to obtain basic uniformity
of traffic control devices on all streets and highways are described in
23 CFR 655 Subpart F. The actions required for road users to obey
regulatory devices should be specified by state statute, or in cases
not covered by state statute, by local ordinance or resolution
consistent with national standards.
The use of traffic control devices should provide the reasonable
and prudent road user with the information necessary to safely and
lawfully use the streets, highways, pedestrian facilities, and
bikeways. Furthermore, the selection, application, design, placement,
installation, operation, and maintenance of traffic control devices
should be based on the minimum capabilities described in the Uniform
Vehicle Code that a road user must possess to lawfully operate a
vehicle.
Support:
Uniformity of the meaning of traffic control devices is vital to
their effectiveness. The meanings ascribed in devices in this Manual
are in general accord with the documents mentioned in Section 1A.12.

1A.3 Design of Traffic Control Devices

Guidance:
Devices should be designed so that such features as size, contrast,
colors, shape, composition, and lighting or retroreflection are
combined to draw attention to the devices; that shape, size, colors,
and simplicity of message combine to produce a clear meaning; that
legibility and size combine with placement to permit adequate time for
response; and that uniformity, size, legibility, and reasonableness of
the message combine to command respect.
Standard:
All new symbols and sign colors shall be adopted using the
procedures described in Section 1A.11. All symbols shall be
unmistakably similar to or mirror images of those shown herein. Symbols
and colors shall not be modified.
Guidance:
Other aspects of a device's design should be modified only where
there is demonstrated need. Modifications should be kept to a minimum
and should be done in a way that will preserve the essential
characteristics of the device's appearance.
Options: State and local highway agencies may develop word message
signs to notify road users of special regulations or to warn of special
situations or hazards. Unlike with symbol signs and colors, new word
message signs may be used without the need for experimentation. With
the exception of symbols and colors, minor modifications in the
specific design elements of a device may be made provided the essential
appearance characteristics are preserved. Although the standard design
of symbol signs cannot be modified, it may be appropriate to change the
orientation of the symbol to better reflect the direction of travel.

1A.4 Placement and Operation of Traffic Control Devices

Guidance:
Placement of the device should assure that it is within the cone of
vision of the

[[Page 73619]]

viewer so that it will command attention; that it is appropriately
positioned with respect to the location, object, or situation to which
it applies to aid in conveying the proper meaning; and that its
location, combined with suitable legibility, is such that a road user
has adequate time to make the proper response in both day and night
conditions.
Traffic control devices should be placed and operated in a uniform
and consistent manner to assist road users in properly responding to
the device, based on their previous exposure to similar traffic control
situations.
Unnecessary traffic control devices should be removed. The fact
that a device is in good physical condition should not be a basis for
deferring needed replacement or change.

1A.5 Maintenance of Traffic Control Devices

Guidance:
Functional maintenance of traffic control devices should be
provided to determine if certain devices need to be changed to meet
current traffic conditions.
Physical maintenance of traffic control devices should be performed
to ensure that legibility is retained, that the device is visible, and
that it functions properly in relation to other traffic control devices
in the vicinity.
Support:
Clean, legible, properly mounted devices in good working condition
command the respect of road users.

1A.6 Uniformity of Traffic Control Devices

Support:
Uniformity of devices simplifies the task of the road user because
it aids in recognition and understanding, thereby reducing perception/
reaction time. It aids road users, police officers, and traffic courts
by giving everyone the same interpretation. It aids public highway and
traffic officials through efficiency in manufacture, installation,
maintenance, and administration. Simply stated, uniformity means
treating similar situations in the same way. The use of uniform traffic
control devices does not, in itself, constitute uniformity. A standard
device used where it is not appropriate is as objectionable as a
nonstandard device; in fact, this may be worse, because such misuse may
result in disrespect at those locations where the device is needed.

1A.7 Responsibiloity for Traffic Control Devices

Standard:
The responsibility for the design, placement, operation,
maintenance, and uniformity of traffic control devices shall rest with
the public agency or the official having jurisdiction. 23 CFR 655.603
adopts the MUTCD as the national standard for all traffic control
devices installed on any street, highway, or bicycle path open to
public travel. When a State or other Federal agency MUTCD or supplement
is required, they shall be in substantial conformance with the national
MUTCD.
23 CFR 655.603 also states that traffic control devices on all
streets and highways open to public travel in each State shall be in
substantial conformance with standards issued or endorsed by the
Federal Highway Administrator.
Support:
The Uniform Vehicle Code has the following provision in Section 15-
104 for the adoption of a uniform Manual:
``(a) The [State Highway Agency] shall adopt a manual and
specification for a uniform system of traffic-control devices
consistent with the provisions of this code for use upon highways
within this State. Such uniform system shall correlate with and so far
as possible conform to the system set forth in the most recent edition
of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and
Highways, and other standards issued or endorsed by the Federal Highway
Administrator.
``(b) The Manual adopted pursuant to subsection (a) shall have the
force and effect of law.''
Additionally, States are encouraged to adopt Uniform Vehicle Code,
Section 15-117 which states that, ``No person shall install or maintain
in any area of private property used by the public any sign, signal,
marking or other device intended to regulate, warn of guide traffic
unless it conforms with the State manual and specifications adopted
under Sec. 15-104.''

1A.8 Placement Authority

Standard:
Traffic control devices and other signs or messages within the
highway right-of-away shall be placed only by a public authority or the
official having jurisdiction, for the purpose of regulating, warning,
or guiding traffic.
When the public authority or the official having jurisdiction over
a street or highway has granted proper authority, others such as
contractors and public utility companies shall be permitted to install
temporary traffic control devices. Such traffic control devices shall
conform to the standards of this Manual.
Guidance:
Any unauthorized traffic control device or other sign or message
placed on the highway right-of-way by a private organization or
individual constitutes a public nuisance and should be removed. All
unofficial and non-essential signs should be removed.
Standard:
All regulatory devices shall be supported by laws, ordinances, or
regulations.
Support:
Provisions of this Manual are based on the concept that effective
traffic control depends upon both appropriate application of the
devices and reasonable enforcement of the regulations.

1A.9 Engineering Study or Judgment Required

Standard:
This Manual describes the application of traffic control devices,
but shall not be a legal requirement for their installation, unless so
stated in any specific section.
Guidance:
The decision to use a particular device at a particular location
should be made on the basis of either an engineering study or the
application of engineering judgment. Thus while this Manual provides
standards for design and application of traffic control devices, the
Manual should not be considered a substitute for engineering judgment.
Qualified engineers should exercise engineering judgment inherent
in the selection and application of traffic control devices, just as in
the location and design of the roads and streets which the devices
complement. Jurisdictions with responsibility for traffic control that
do not have qualified engineers on their staffs, should seek assistance
from the State transportation agency, their county, a nearby large
city, or a traffic engineering consultant.

1A.10 Meaning of STANDARD, GUIDANCE, OPTION, AND SUPPORT

Support:
The standard, guidance, option, and support material described in
this edition of the MUTCD provide the engineer with the information
needed to

[[Page 73620]]

make appropriate decisions regarding the use of traffic control devices
on streets and highways. This is organized to better differentiate
between required conditions for traffic control devices (standards)
that must be satisfied and other conditions (guidance and options)
which may or may not be applicable, depending upon the particular
circumstances of a situation.
Throughout this Manual the headings ``Standard,'' ``Guidance,''
``Option,'' and ``Support'' are used to classify the nature of the text
that follows.
Standard:
When used in this Manual the headings shall be defined as follows:
1. Standard: A statement of required, mandatory or specifically
prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All standards
are labeled and the headings appear in uppercase, blocked, and bold
type. The word ``shall'' is typically used. Standards are sometimes
modified by options.
2. Guidance: A statement of recommended but not mandatory practice
in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgment
or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All
guidance statements are labeled and the headings appear in uppercase
shaded type. The word ``should'' is typically used. Guidance statements
are sometimes modified by options.
3. Option: A statement of practice which is a permissive condition
and carries no recommendation or mandate. Options may contain allowable
modifications to a standard and/or guidance. All option statements are
labeled and the headings appear in lowercase normal type. The word
``may'' is typically used.
4. Support: An informational statement which does not convey any
degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or
enforceable condition. Support statements are labeled and the headings
appear in uppercase normal type.
Support:
Figures, tables, and illustrations supplement the text and might
constitute a Standard, Guidance, Option, or Support. The reader can
refer to the appropriate text to determine the meaning of the figure,
table, or illustration.

1A.11 Manual Changes, Interpretations and Authority to Experiment

Standard:
Use of devices that do not conform to the provisions of this Manual
shall be prohibited unless the provisions of this section are followed.
Support:
Continuing advances in technology will produce changes in the
highway, the vehicle, and in road user proficiency, and portions of the
system of control devices in this Manual will require updating. In
addition, unique situations often arise for device applications which
might require interpretation or clarification of this Manual. It is
important to have a procedure for recognizing these developments and
for introducing new ideas and modifications into the system.
Guidance:
Requests for any change, interpretation or permission to experiment
should be sent to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of
Transportation Operation (HOTO), 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
D.C. 20590. The request to experiment may be sent directly to HOTO with
a copy to the FHWA Division Office or the request may be sent to the
FHWA Division Office and then forwarded to HOTO. Diagrams showing the
process for changes to the MUTCD and experimentation with traffic
control devices are included after this section.
1. Change--A change includes consideration of new devices to
replace a present standard device, additional devices to be added to
the list of standard devices, or revisions to recommended application
or meaning criteria.
Request for a change in the Manual should contain the following
information:
(a) A statement indicating what change is proposed.
(b) Any illustration which would be helpful to understand the
request.
(c) Any supporting research data which is pertinent to the item to
be reviewed.
2. Interpretation--An interpretation includes application and
operation of standard traffic control devices, official meanings of
standard traffic control devices, or variations from standard device
designs.
Requests for an interpretation of the Manual should contain the
following information:
(a) A concise statement of the interpretation being sought.
(b) A description of the condition which provoked the need for an
interpretation.
(c) Any illustration which would be helpful to understand the
request.
(d) Any supporting research data which is pertinent to the item to
be interpreted.
3. Experiment--Requests to experiment include consideration of
testing or evaluating a new traffic control device, its application or
manner of use, or a provision not specifically described in this
Manual.
Request for permission to experiment will be considered only when
submitted by the governmental agency or private toll facility
responsible for the operation of the road or street on which the
experiment is to take place and should contain the following:
(a) A statement indicating the nature of the problem.
(b) A description of the proposed change, how it was developed, the
manner in which it deviates from the standard, and how it is expected
to be an improvement over existing standards.
(c) Any illustration which would be helpful to understand the
experimental device or use of the device.
(d) Any supporting data explaining how the experimental device was
developed, if it has been tried, in what way it was found to be
adequate or inadequate, and how this choice of device or application
was derived.
(e) A detailed research or evaluation plan including the time
period and location(s) of the experiment. This plan must also provide
for close monitoring of the experimentation, especially in the early
stages of its field implementation.
(f) An agreement to restore the experiment site to a condition
which complies with the provisions of the Manual within 3 months
following the end of the time period of the experiment. This agreement
must also provide that the agency sponsoring the experimentation will
terminate the experimentation at any time that it determines
significant safety hazards are directly or indirectly attributable to
the experimentation. The Office of Transportation Operations may also
terminate approval of the experimentation at any time if there is an
indication of hazards. If, as a result of the experimentation, a
request is made that the Manual be changed to include the device or
application being experimented with, the device or application may
remain in place until an official rulemaking action has occurred.
(g) An agreement to provide semiannual progress reports for the
duration of the experimentation and to provide a copy of the final
results of the experimentation to the Office of Transportation
Operations (HOTO), within 3 months following completion

[[Page 73621]]

of the experimentation. The Office of Transportation Operations may
terminate approval of the experimentation if reports are not provided
in accordance with this schedule.
Support:
Procedures for revising the Manual are set out in the Federal
Register of June 30, 1983, (48 FR 30145).
For additional copies of information concerning changes,
interpretations, or experimentation, write to the FHWA (HOTO), 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20590.

BILLING CODE 4910-22-M

[[Page 73622]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.000

[[Page 73623]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.001

BILLING CODE 4910-22-C

[[Page 73624]]

1A.12 Relation to Other Documents

Support:
Two publications by the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws
and Ordinances are specifically designed to provide the content and
language of legislation needed to give regulatory devices the same
meaning in all jurisdictions. These are the Uniform Vehicle Code and
the Model Traffic Ordinance. Both the Code and the Ordinance require
the placing of signs or other traffic control devices to make some of
their provisions effective, and both define the legal meaning of
certain devices. The Code directs State authorities to adopt a manual
for a uniform system of traffic control devices, and requires all
devices to conform thereto. The Ordinance also requires municipalities
or other local governments to conform with the State manual for traffic
control devices. The adoption of appropriate legislation is an
essential step toward uniformity.
Standard:
To the extent they are incorporated by specific reference, the
latest editions of the following documents, or those editions
specifically noted, shall be a part of this Manual:
``Standard Alphabets for Highway Signs and Pavement Markings,'' FHWA
``Standard Color Tolerance Limits,'' FHWA
``Standard Highway Signs,'' FHWA
``Vehicle Traffic Control Signal Heads,'' Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE)
``Pedestrian Traffic Control Signal Indications,'' ITE
``Purchase Specification for Flashing and Steady Burn Warning Lights,''
ITE
``Traffic Signal Lamps,'' ITE
``Uniform Vehicle Code'' and ``Model Traffic Ordinance'', National
Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances.
Support:
Other documents that are useful sources of information with respect
to utilization of these standards include:
``Traffic Engineering Handbook'', ITE
``Highway Capacity Manual,'' Transportation Research Board (TRB)
``A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets,'' American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
``Guidelines for the Selection of Supplemental Guide Signs for Traffic
Generators Adjacent to Freeways, (AASHTO)
List of Control Cities for Use in Guide Signs on Interstate Highways,''
ASSHTO
``Manual on Traffic Engineering Studies,'' ITE
``Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies,'' ITE
``Roadside Design Guide,'' AASHTO
``School Trip Safety Program Guidelines,'' ITE
``Manual of Traffic Signal Design,'' ITE
``Traffic Signal Installation and Maintenance Manual,'' ITE
``Traffic Detector Handbook,'' ITE
``Signal Manual of Recommended Practice,'' Association of American
Railroads (AAR)

1A.13 Color Code

Support:
The following color code establishes general meanings for eight
colors of a total of twelve colors that have been identified as being
appropriate for use in conveying traffic control information. Central
values and tolerance limits for each color are available from the
Federal Highway Administration (HOTO), 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Washington, D.C. 20590.
The three colors for which general meanings have not yet been
assigned are being reserved for future applications that will be
determined only by FHWA after consultation with the States, the
engineering community, and the general public. The meanings described
in this Section are of a general nature. More specific assignments of
colors are given in the individuals Parts of this Manual relating to
each class of devices.
Standard:

YELLOW............................. General warning
RED................................ Stop or prohibition
BLUE............................... Road user services guidance,
Tourist information, and Civil
defense evacuation route
GREEN.............................. Indicated movements permitted,
direction guidance
BROWNn............................. Recreational and cultural
interest guidance
ORANGE............................. Temporary traffic control
BLACK.............................. Regulation
WHITE.............................. Regulation
FLOURESCENT YELLOW-GREEN........... Pedestrian, Bicycle, School
Warning
PURPLE............................. Unassigned
LIGHT BLUE......................... Unassigned
CORAL.............................. Unassigned

1A.14 Defintiions of Words and Phrases

Standard:
All words and phrases uses in this Manual shall have the meaning
described herein. Unless otherwise defined herein, or in the other
parts of this Manual, definitions contained in the most recent edition
of the Uniform Vehicle Code, AASHTO Transportation Glossary (Highway
Definitions), and other documents specified in Section 1A.12 are also
incorporated and adopted by reference.
When definitions vary from UVC and AASHTO Glossary, the MUTCD
definition shall be followed. Definitions included in this section are
for items that are used throughout the MUTCD. If a term is used only in
one specific part of the Manual (i.e., Signals), then the definition
will appear in that specific part of the Manual.
85th percentile speed.--The speed at or below which eighty-five
percent of the motorized vehicles travel.
Active highway-rail grade crossing warning system.--The flashing
signals, with or without traffic gates, together with the necessary
control equipment used to inform road users of the approach or presence
of trains at the grade crossing.
Advisory speed.--A recommended maximum speed for all typical
vehicles operating on a section of highway and based on an engineering
study of the highway design and operating characteristics.
Approach.--All lanes of traffic moving towards an intersection or a
mid-block location from one direction, including any adjacent parking
lane(s).
Arterial highway (street).--A general term denoting a highway
primarily use by through traffic, usually on a continuous route or a
highway designated as part of an arterial highway system.
Average day.--A day representing traffic volumes normally and
repeatedly found at a location, typically a weekdays when volumes are
influenced by employment or a weekend day when volumes are influenced
by entertainment or recreation.
Average speed.--The summation of the distances traveled divided by
the summation of the time in motion to traverse the distances for all
vehicles. Also may be the summation of the measured speeds of vehicles
divided by the number of vehicles observed.
Bicycle.--A pedal-powered vehicle upon which the human operator
sits.
Bicycle path.--A separate trail or path from which motor vehicles
are prohibited and which is for the

[[Page 73625]]

exclusive use of bicycles or the shared use of bicycles and
pedestrians. Where such trail or path forms a part of a highway, it is
separated from the roadways for motor vehicle traffic by an open space
or barrier.
Bicycle route.--A system of bikeways designated by appropriate
route makers, and by the jurisdiction having authority.
Bikeway.--Any road, street, path, or way which in some manner is
specifically designated as being open to bicycle travel, regardless of
whether such facilities are designated for the exclusive use of
bicycles or are to be shared with other transportation modes.
Center line markings.--The yellow pavement marking line(s) that
delineate the separation of traffic lanes which have opposite
directions of travel on a roadway. These markings need not be at the
geometrical center of the pavement.
Changeable message sign.--A sign with the flexibility to display
various messages.
Channelizing line markings.--White pavement marking lines that
define the neutral area, direct existing traffic at the proper angle
for smooth divergence into the ramp, and reduce the probability of
collision with objects adjacent to the roadway.
Collector highway.--A term denoting a highway which in rural areas
connects small towns and local highways to arterial highways, and in
urban areas provides land access and traffic circulation within
residential, commercial and business areas and connects local highways
to the arterial highways.
Crosswalk.--(a) That part of a roadway at an intersection included
within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on
opposite sides of the highway measured from the curbs or in the absence
of curbs, from the edges of the traversable roadway, and in the absence
of a sidewalk on one side of the roadway, the part of a roadway
included within the extension of the lateral lines of the sidewalk at
right angles to the centerline.
(b) Any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere
distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings
on the surface.
Crosswalk lines.--White pavement marking lines that mark both edges
of a crosswalk.
Design speed.--A speed determined by the design and correlation of
the physical features of a highway that influence vehicle operation.
Edge line markings.--White or yellow pavement marking lines that
delineates the right or left edge(s) of a travel way.
End of roadway marker.--A device used to warn and alert road users
of the end of a roadway in other than construction or maintenance
areas.
Engineering judgment.--The evaluation of available pertinent
information, and the application of appropriate principles, standards,
guidance, and practice as contained in this Manual and other sources,
for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation,
or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall
be exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the
supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and
criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering
judgment is not required.
Engineering study.--The comprehensive analysis and evaluation of
available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate
principles, standards, guidance, and practice as contained in this
Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the
applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control
device. An engineering study shall be performed by an engineer, or by
an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the
application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An
engineering study shall be documented.
Flashing (flashing mode).--A mode of operation in which a traffic
signal indication is turned on and off repetitively.
Flashing beacon.--A highway traffic signal with one or more signal
sections that operates in a flashing mode.
Guide signs.--A sign that shows route designations, destinations,
directions, distances, services, points of interest, or other
geographical, recreational, or cultural information.
Highway-rail grade crossing (roadway-rail intersection).--The
general area where a highway and a railroad cross at the same level,
within which are included the railroad, roadway and roadside facilities
for traffic traversing that area.
Highway, road, or street.--General terms denoting a public way for
purposes of travel, including the entire area within the right-of-way.
Highway traffic signal.--A power-operated traffic control device by
which traffic is warned or directed to take some specific action. These
devices do not include power-operated signs, barricade warning lights,
or steady burning electric lamps.
Intersection.--(a) The area embraced within the prolongation or
connection of the lateral curb lines, or if none, the lateral boundary
lines of the roadways of two highways that join one another at, or
approximately at, right angles, or the area within which vehicles
traveling on different highways that join at any other angle may come
into conflict.
(b) If a highway includes two roadways 9 meters (30 ft) or more
apart, then every crossing of each roadway of such divided highway by
an intersecting highway shall be regarded as a separate intersection.
If the intersecting highway also includes two roadways 9 meters (30 ft)
or more apart, then every crossing of two roadways of such highways
shall be regarded as a separate intersection.
(c) The junction of an alley or driveway with a roadway or highway
shall not constitute an intersection
Island.--A defined area between traffic lanes for control of
vehicular movements or for pedestrian refuge. Within an intersection
area, a median or an outer separation is considered to be an island.
Lane line markings.--The white pavement marking lines(s) that
delineate the separation of traffic lanes that have the same direction
of travel on a roadway.
Lane-use control signal.--An overhead signal face displaying
indications to permit or prohibit the use of specific lanes of a
roadway or to indicate the impending prohibition of such use.
Major roadway.--The roadway normally carrying the higher volume of
vehicular traffic.
Median.--Area between two roadways of a divided highway measured
from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excludes
turn lanes. The median width may be different between intersections,
and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.
Minor roadway.--The roadway normally carrying the lower volume of
vehicular traffic.
Roadway network.--A geographical arrangement of intersecting
roadways.
Object markers.--Devices used to mark obstructions within or
adjacent to the roadway.
Operating speed.--A speed at which a typical vehicle or the overall
traffic operates. May be defined with speed values such as the average,
pace, or 85th percentile speeds.
Pace speed.--The highest speed within a specific range of speeds
which represents more vehicles than in any other like range of speed.
The range of speeds typically used is 10 mph.
Paved.--A bituminous surface treatment, mixed bituminous concrete,
or portland cement concrete roadway surface which has both a structural
(weight bearing) and a sealing purpose for the roadway.

[[Page 73626]]

Pedestrian.--A person afoot, in a wheelchair, on skates, or on a
skateboard.
Platoon.--A group of vehicles or pedestrians traveling together as
a group, either voluntarily or involuntarily, because of traffic signal
controls, geometrics, or other factors.
Posted speed.--A speed limit displayed on a traffic control device.
Preferential bicycle lane.--A portion of a roadway or shoulder
which has been designated for use by bicyclists. It is distinguished
from the portion of the roadway for motor vehicle traffic by a paint
stripe, curb, or other similar device.
Preferential lane marking.--Consists of white lines formed in a
diamond shape.
Pretimed operation.--A type of controller unit operation during
which the length of various intervals remains constant.
Raised pavement marker.--A device with a height of at least 10 mm
(0.4 inch), mounted on or in a road surface and intended to supplement
or substitute for pavement markings.
Regulatory signs.--A sign that gives notice of traffic laws or
regulations.
Resistance gate (second gate).--A type of traffic gate located
downstream of the moveable bridge warning gate which may provide a
physical barrier to vehicle and/or pedestrian traffic when placed in
the appropriate position. Additional information is contained in the
AASHTO Standard Specifications for Moveable Highway Bridges.
Retroreflectivity.--The return of a point source illumination from
a surface to its origin.
Right-of-way [assignment].--Permitting vehicles and/or pedestrians
to proceed in a lawful manner in preference to other vehicles or
pedestrians by the display of signal indications.
Road (see roadway).
Road delineators.--Retroreflective devices mounted above the
roadway surface and at the side of the roadway in a series to indicate
the alignment of the roadway.
Road user.--A vehicle operator, bicyclist, or pedestrian within the
highway.
Roadway.--That portion of a highway improved, designed, or
ordinarily used for vehicular travel, exclusive of the sidewalk, berm,
or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm or shoulder is used by
persons riding bicycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a
highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term ``roadway'' as
used herein shall refer to any such ``roadway'' separately but not to
all such roadways collectively. Roadway includes parking lanes.
Roadway-rail intersection (see highway-rail grade crossing.
Rural.--A type of roadway defined by the jurisdiction in compliance
with their legislation, statute, regulations, and policies.
Second gate (see resistance gate).
Semi-actuated operation.--A type of operation of a controller unit
in which one or more, but not all, signal phases do not function on
basis of actuation.
Shared roadway.--A roadway which is officially designated and
marked as a bicycle route, but which is open to motor vehicle travel
and upon which no bicycle lane is designated.
Sidewalk.--That portion of a street between the curb line, or the
lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line, intended for
use by pedestrians.
Sign illumination.--Either internal or external lighting that shows
the same color day or night. Street, highway, or strobe lighting shall
not be considered as meeting this definition.
Sign legend.--All word messages, borders, logos, and symbol designs
that are intended to convey specific meanings.
Signal face.--Front part of a signal head.
Signal head.--An assembly of one or more signal faces together with
the associated signal housings.
Signal housing.--That part of a signal section that protects the
light source and other required components.
Signal indication.--The illumination of a signal lens or equivalent
device or a combination of several lenses or equivalent devices at the
same time.
Signal installation.--The traffic signal equipment, signal heads
and their supports, and associated electrical circuitry at a particular
location.
Speed.--The 85th percentile, design, average, operating, posted or
statutory speed as defined by the road authority for the engineering
application.
Speed limit.--The maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a
section of highway as established by law.
Speed measurement marking.--A white transverse pavement marking
placed on the roadway to assist the enforcement of speed regulations.
Speed zone.--A section of highway with a speed limit which is
established by law but which is different form a legislatively
specified statutory speed limit. Often established by administrative
action as permitted by law.
Statutory speed.--A speed limit established by legislative action
which typically is applicable for highways with specified design,
functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristic.
Stop line.--A solid white pavement marking line extending across
approach lanes to indicate the point at which a stop is intended or
required to be made.
Street (see roadway).
Traffic.--Pedestrains, ridden or herded animals, vehicles,
streetcars, and other conveyances either singularly or together while
using any highway for purposes of travel.
Traffic control devices.--All signs, signals, markings, islands,
and other devices used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on,
over, or adjacent to a street, highway, road, pedestrian facility, or
bicycle path by authority of a public body or official having
jurisdiction.
Traffic control signal (traffic signal).--Any highway traffic
signal by which traffic is alternately assigned the right-of-way to the
various movements at an intersection or other roadway location.
Train.--A locomotive or self-propelled unit which is assigned a
train number, which operates on fixed rails or tracks and to which all
other traffic must yield the right-of-way by law.
Transverse markings.--Pavement markings that include shoulder
markings, word and symbol markings, stop liens, crosswalk lines, speed
measurement markings, parking space markings, and others.
Traveled way.--The portion of the roadway for the movement of
vehicles, exclusive of the shoulders, berms, sidewalks, and parking
lanes.
Urban.--A type of roadway as defined by the jurisdictions in
compliance with their legislation, statute, regulations, and policies.
Vehicle.--Every device in, upon, or by which any person or property
may be transported or drawn upon a highway, except trains. A light rail
car operating on a roadway, to which other traffic is not required to
yield the right-of-way by law, is vehicle.
Warning gate.--A type of traffic gate designed to warn, but not to
primarily provide a physical barrier to, vehicle and/or pedestrian
traffic when placed in the appropriate position.
Warning sign.--A sign that calls attention to conditions on a
adjacent to a highway or street that present a situation that may not
be readily apparent to the road user.
Warrant.--A warrant describes threshold conditions to the engineer
in evaluating the potential safety and operational benefits of traffic
control devices and is based upon ``average'' or ``normal'' conditions.
Warrants are not a substitute for engineering judgment. The fact that a
warrant for a particular traffic

[[Page 73627]]

control device is met is not conclusive justification for the
installation of the device.
Wrong-way arrows.--Slender, elongated, white pavement marking
arrows placed upstream from the ramp terminus to indicate the correct
direction of traffic flow. They are intended primarily to warn wrong-
way road users that they are going in the wrong direction.

1.A.15 Abbreviations

Standard:
The following are standard abbreviations for word messages used in
connection with traffic control devices:
ON SIGNS
ALT = alternate
AM = morning
AVE = avenue
BIKE = bicycle
BLVD = boulevard
CB = CB Radio
CD = civil defense
CYCLES = 2-wheeled vehicles
D = diesel fuel
DR = drive
E = east
EV = electric vehicle
EXEMPT = stop at highway-rail grade crossing not required by some
types of vehicles
FM = FM radio
FT = feet
H = hospital
HR = hour
INFO = information
JCT = junction/intersection
KM = kilometers
KM/HR = kilometers per hour
LN = lane
LBS = pounds
LP-GAS = liquid propane gas
LUGS = tires with lugs
M = meters
MIN = minutes
MI = miles
MON-FRI = days of week
M.P.H. = miles per hour
NAT'L = national
N = north
P = parking
PED = pedestrian
PHONE = telephone
PM = afternoon/night
R.R. = highway-rail grade crossing
ST = street
T = tons of weight
US = state numbered route
2-WAY = two way intersection
- = to
& = and
? = information
% = percent
`` = inches
` = feet

PAVEMENT MARKINGS
MPH = miles per hour
PED = pedestrian
RXR = highway-rail grade crossing
US = state numbered route
XING = crossings other than highway-rail grade

ON SIGNALS
DONT = do not

3B. Pavement and Curb Markings

3B.1 Yellow Longitudinal Line Markings

A. Center Line Markings
Standard:
Center line markings, when used, shall be the pavement markings
used to delineate the separation of traffic lanes which have opposite
directions of travel on a roadway. These markings need not be placed at
the geometrical center of the roadway.
Option: On roadways without a continuous center line marking, short
sections may be marked with center line to control the position of
traffic at specific locations, (e.g. around curves, over hills, on
approaches to roadway-rail intersections, at roadway-rail intersections
and at bridges.)
Standard:
The center line markings on two-lane, two-way roadways shall be one
of the following as shown in Figure 3-1:
<bullet> Broken center line markings consisting of a normal broken
yellow line where crossing the centerline markings for passing with
care is permitted for traffic traveling in each direction.
<bullet> One-direction no-passing zone markings consisting of a
normal broken yellow line and a normal solid yellow line where crossing
the center line markings for passing with care is permitted for the
traffic traveling adjacent to the broken line but is prohibited for
traffic traveling adjacent to the solid line.
<bullet> Two-direction no-passing zone markings consisting of two
normal solid yellow lines where crossing the centerline markings for
passing is prohibited for traffic traveling in each direction.
Standard:
The center line markings one two-ways roadways with four or more
traffic lanes always available, shall be the two-directions no-passing
zone markings as shown in Figures 3-2 and 3-3.
Guidance:
On two-way roadways with three traffic lanes, two lanes should be
designated for traffic in one direction by using one- or two-direction
no-passing zone markings as shown in Figure 3-4.
Standard:
Center line markings shall be placed on paved two-way traveled ways
on streets and highways having one or more of the following
characteristics.
(a) All urban and rural arterials and collectors that have a
roadway of 6 m (20 ft) or more in width with an ADT of 6000 or greater.
(b) All urban and rural highways that have three or more traffic
lanes.
Guidance:
Center line markings should be place on the paved, two-way traveled
ways on streets and highways having the following characteristics:
<bullet> Urban arterials and collectors that have a roadway 6 m (20
ft) or more in width with an ADT of 4000 or greater.
<bullet> All rural arterials and collectors that have a roadway of
5.5 m (18 ft) or more in width with an ADT of 3000 or greater.
An engineering study should be used in determining whether to place
center line markings on a traveled way less than 4.8 m (16 ft) wide due
to traffic encroaching on the pavement edges, traffic being affected by
parked vehicles, and due to traffic encroachment into the lane of
opposing traffic where edge line markings are used.
Option: Center line markings may be placed on other two-way
roadways 4.8 m (16 ft) or more in width.
B. No-Passing Zone markings
Standard:
A no-passing zone shall be marked by either the one direction no-
passing zone markings or the two-direction no-passing zone markings
described above and shown in Figures 3-1b, 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4.
When center line markings are used, the no-passing zone marking
shall be used on two-way roadways at lane reduction transitions
(Sections 3B.5) and on approaches to obstructions that must be passed
on the right (Section 3B.6).
Guidance:
Where the distance between successive no-passing zones is less than
120 m (400 ft), no-passing markings should connect the zones.
Option: In addition to the pavement markings herein prescribed, no-
passing zone signs (Section 2B.21, 2B.22, 2C.38) may be used to
emphasize the existence and extent of a no-passing zone.
Support:
Specific reference is made to Section 11-307 UVC Revised.

[[Page 73628]]

Standard:
On two-way, two- or three-lane roadways where center line markings
are installed, no-passing zones shall be established as follows:
(1) at vertical and horizontal curves and other locations where an
engineering study indicates passing must be prohibited because of
inadequate sight distances or there special conditions.
(2) with the no-passing zone markings extended throughout the no-
passing zone.
(3) on three-lane roadways where two lanes from each direction of
travel transition to become one lane for each direction of travel, a
median island shall be provided in the center lane. The median island
shall consist of a lane transition at each end of a buffer zone and
shown in Figure 3-5.
Guidance:
For roadways having a posted or statutory speed limit of 70 KM/H
(45 mph) or greater, the transition taper length should be computed by
the formula L = 0.62WS (L=WS).
For roadways having a posted or statutory speed limit of 60 KM/H
(40 mph) or less, the taper length should be computed by the formula
L=WS\2\/155 (L=WS\2\/60). Under both formulas, L equals the taper
length in meters (feet), W equals the width of the center lane in
meters (feet), and S equals the posted or statutory speed limiting in
kilometers (miles) per hours.
The minimum taper length of the lane transitions shall be 30 m (100
ft) in urban areas and 60 m (200 ft) in rural areas.
Standard:
On roadways with center line markings, a no-passing zone marking
shall be used at a horizontal or vertical curve where the sight
distance is less than the minimum necessary for safe passing at the
posted or statutory speed limit a s shown in Table 3-1, Passing sight
distance on a vertical curve is the distance at which an object 1.07 m
(3.50 ft) above the pavement can be seen by an approaching driver
(Figure 3-6a). Similarly, passing sight distance on a horizontal curve
is the distance measured along the center line (or right hand lane line
of a three-lane highway) between two points 1.07 m (3.50 ft) above the
pavement on a line tangent to the embankment or other obstruction that
cuts off the view on the inside of the curve (Figure 3-6b).

Table 3-1. Minimum Passing Sight Distances
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted or Statutory Speed Limit Minimum Passing
------------------------------------------------------- Sight Distance
-----------------
km/h mph meters feet
------------------------------------------------------------------------
40........................................... 25 140 450
50........................................... 30 160 500
60........................................... 35 180 550
a............................................ 40 ....... 600
70........................................... 45 210 700
80........................................... 50 245 800
90........................................... 55 280 900
100.......................................... 60 320 1,000
110.......................................... 65 355 1,100
120.......................................... 70 395 1,200
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Support:
The beginning of a no-passing zone at point ``a,'' in Figure 3-6 is
that point where the sight distance first becomes less than that
specified in Table 3-1. The end of the no-passing zone at point ``b''
in Figure 3-6 that point at which the sight distance again becomes
greater than the minimum specified.
C. Reversible Lane Line Markings
Standard:
The reversible lane line markings shall consist of two normal
broken double yellow lines to delineate the edges of a lane in which
the direction of travel is changed from time to time in such a way that
these markings serve as the center line markings of the roadway during
some period. Signs, signals, or both shall be used to supplement these
pavement markings as shown in Figure 3-7.
D. Two-Way Left Turn Lane Markings
Standard:
The two-way left turn lane markings shall consist of a normal
broken yellow line and a normal solid yellow line to delineate both
edges of a two-way left turn lane which may be used by traffic for part
of a left turn maneuver. These markings shall be placed with the broken
line toward the two-way left turn lane and the solid line toward the
adjacent traffic lane as show in Figure 3-3a. Traffic adjacent to the
solid line may cross such markings with care only as part of a left
turn maneuver.
Option: Pavement marking arrows may be used in conjunction with the
two-way left turn markings as shown in Figure 3-3a.
Guidance:
Signs should be used in conjunction with the two-way left turn
markings (Section 2B.19).
E. Median Islands Formed by Pavement Markings
Standard:
Two double solid yellow lines shall be used to form continuous
median islands where these islands separate travel in opposite
directions as shown in Figures 3-2b and 3-5. Other markings in the
median island area shall be yellow, except crosswalk markings which
shall be white (Section 3B.8).
F. Left Edge Line Markings
Standard:
The left edge line markings shall consist of a normal solid yellow
line to delineate the left edge of a roadway, or to indicate driving or
passing restrictions left of these markings on the roadways of divided
and one-way highways and on any ramp in the direction of travel
(Section 3B.3).

3B.2 White Longitudinal Line Markings

A. Lane Line Markings
Standard:
Lane line markings when used, shall be the pavement markings used
to delineate the separation of traffic lanes that have the same
direction of travel.
Support:
Typical applications of lane line markings are shown in Figures 3-1
through 3-6, 3-8 through 3-13, 3-20, and 3-21.
Standard:
The broken white lane line markings shall consist of a normal
broken white line where crossing the lane line markings with care is
permitted.
Standard:
The solid lane line markings shall consist of a normal solid white
line where crossing the lane line markings is discouraged.
Option: Solid white lane line markings may be used to separate
through traffic lanes from auxiliary lanes, such as uphill truck lanes,
left or right turn lanes and preferential lanes. They may also be used
to separate traffic lanes approaching an intersection. Wide solid lane
line markings may be used for greater emphasis.
Standard:
Double solid lane markings shall consist of two normal solid white
lines where crossing the lane line markings is prohibited.
Standard:
Lane line markings shall be used on all Interstate highways and
freeways.

[[Page 73629]]

Guidance:
Lane line markings should be used at the following locations:
(a) on all roadways with 2 or more adjacent traffic lanes that have
the same direction of travel,
(b) at congested locations where the roadway will accommodate more
traffic lanes with lane line markings than without the markings.
Standard:
The channelizing line shall be a wide or double solid white line.
Other markings in the island area shall be a normal solid white line.
Option: The channelizing line may be used to form islands where
traffic with the same direction of travel is permitted on both sides of
the island.
Support:
Typical examples of channelizing line applications are shown in
Figures 3-2, 3-3, 3-8, 3-9, 3-11, 3-12, 3-13c, and 3-20.
C. Interchange Ramp Markings
Support:
Channelizing lines at exit ramps as shown in Figure 3-11, define
the neutral area, direct existing traffic at the proper angle for
smooth divergence into the ramp, and reduce the probability of
colliding with objects adjacent to the roadway.
Channelizing lines at entrance ramps as shown in Figure 3-12,
promote safe and efficient merging with the through traffic.
Standard:
For exit ramps, channelizing lines shall be placed along the sides
of the neutral area adjacent to the through traffic lane and the ramp
lane. With a parallel deceleration lane, a lane line shall be extended
from the beginning of the channelizing line upstream for a distance of
one-half the length of the full-width deceleration lane.
Option: White transverse markings may be placed in neutral area for
special emphasis, as shown in Figures 3-11a,b, and 3-12c.
Guidance:
For entrance ramps, a channelizing line should be placed along the
side of the neutral area adjacent to the ramp lane.
On entrance ramps with a parallel acceleration lane, or lane line
should be extended from the end of the channelizing line for a distance
one-half the length of the full width acceleration lane, as should in
Figure 3-12a.
Option: With a tapered acceleration lane, lane line markings may be
placed to extend the channelizing line, but not beyond a point where
the tapered lane meets the near side of the through traffic lane, as
shown in Figure 3-12b.
Lane drop markings as shown in Figure 3-11c may be used in advance
of lane drops at exit ramps to distinguish a lane drop from a normal
exit ramp or from an auxiliary lane. The lane drop marking may consist
of a wide, white dotted line with segments 900 mm (3ft) in length
separated by 3.6 m (12ft) gaps.
Guidance:
If used, lane drop markings should begin 800 m (0.5 mi) in advance
of the theoretical gore point.
Option: Where lane changes might cause conflicts, a wide solid
white channelizing line may extend upstream from the theoretical gore
point.
Support:
Pavement marking arrow use for wrong-way traffic is included in
Section 3B.12.
D. Right Edge Line Markings
Standard:
The right edge line markings shall consist of a normal solid white
line to delineate the right edge of the roadway (Section 3B.3).

3B.3 Edge Line Markings

Standard:
Edge line markings are those markings which delineate the right or
left edges of a roadway (Sections 3B.1 and 3B.2).
Edge line markings shall not be continued through intersections.
Guidance:
Edge line markings should not be broken for driveways.
Support:
Edge line markings have unique value as visual references to guide
road users during adverse weather and visibility conditions.

Edge Line Marking Warrants

Standard:
Edge line markings shall be placed on the paved traveled ways on
streets and highways with the following characteristics:
<bullet> freeways
<bullet> expressways
<bullet> rural arterials with a roadway 6 m (20 ft) or more in
width with and ADT of 6000 or greater.
Guidance:
Edge line markings should be placed on the paved roadways of the
following highways:
<bullet> Rural collectors with a roadway 6 m (20 ft) or more in
width and where the edge of the roadway is not otherwise delineated
with curbs or other pavement markings such as for parking.
<bullet> Other paved streets and highways where an engineering
study indicates a need.
Option: Edge line markings may be placed on highways with or
without center line markings. They may be excluded based on engineering
judgment where the traveled way edge are delineated by curbs or other
markings. Edge line markings may be used where edge delineation is
desirable to minimize unnecessary driving on paved shoulders or on
refuge areas that have lesser structural pavement strength than the
adjacent roadway.

3B.4 Extensions Through Intersections or Interchanges

Standard:
Pavement markings extended into or continued through an
intersection or interchange area shall be the same color and at least
the same width as the line markings they extend.
Guidance:
Where highway design or reduced visibility conditions make it
desirable to provide control or to guide vehicles through an
intersection or interchange such as at offset, skewed, complex multi-
legged intersections, or where multiple turn lanes are used, dotted
line markings should be used to extend longitudinal line markings as
necessary through an intersection or interchange area (Figures 3-9, 3-
9a, 3-11 & 3-20).
Where greater restriction is required, solid lane lines or
channelizing lines should be extended into or continued through
intersections.

BILLING CODE 4910-22-M

[[Page 73630]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.002

[[Page 73631]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.003

[[Page 73632]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.004

[[Page 73633]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.005

[[Page 73634]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.006

[[Page 73635]]

3B.9 Stop and Yield Lines

Standard:
Stop lines are solid white lines extending across approach lanes to
indicate the point at which the stop is intended or required to be
made.
Yield lines consist of a row of isosceles triangles extending
across approach lanes, and pointing toward approaching vehicles to
indicate the point at which the yield is intended or required to be
made.
Guidance:
Stop lines should be 300 to 600 mm (12 to 24 in) wide.
Stop lines should be used to indicate the point behind which
vehicles are required to stop, in compliance with a STOP sign or
traffic signal.
The individual triangles comprising the yield line should have a
base of 0.3 to 0.6 m (12 to 24 in) wide and a height equal to 11/2
times the base. The space between the triangles should be 75 to 300 mm
(3 to 12 in). (See Figure 3-24)
Option: Yield lines may be used to indicate the point behind which
vehicles are required to yield in compliance with a YIELD sign.
Guidance:
Stop and yield lines, where used, should be placed 1.2 m (4 ft) in
advance of and parallel to the nearest crosswalk line, except at
roundabouts as provided for in Section 3B.17.
In the absence of a marked crosswalk, the stop line or yield line
should be placed at the desired stopping or yielding point, but should
be placed no more than 9.0 m (30 ft) nor less than 1.2 m (4 ft) from
the nearest edge of the intersecting traveled way. Stop lines should be
placed to ensure sufficient sight distance for all approaches to an
intersection.
Stop lines at mid-block signalized locations should be placed at
least 12.0 m (40 ft) in advance of the nearest signal indication. (See
Section 4B.15)

[[Page 73636]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.007

[[Page 73637]]

3B.12 Pavement Word and Symbol Markings

Support:
Word and symbol markings on the pavement are used for the purpose
of guiding, warning, or regulating traffic. Symbol messages are
preferable to word messages. Examples of standard symbol, word, and
arrow pavement markings are shown in Figures 3-18 and 3-19.
Standard:
Word and symbol markings should be white.
Guidance:
Large letters and numerals should be 1.8 m (6 ft) or more in
height.
Word and symbol markings should not exceed three lines of
information.
If a pavement marking word message consists of more than one word,
it should read in the direction of travel. The first word should be
nearest to the road user.
The longitudinal space between words or symbol message markings,
including arrow markings, should be at least four times the height of
the characters for low speed roads but not more than ten times the
height of the characters under any conditions.
The number of different word and symbol markings used should be
minimized to provide effective guidance and avoid misunderstanding.
Pavement word and symbol markings should be no more than one lane
in width except ``SCHOOL'' word markings.
Option: The ``SCHOOL'' word markings may extend to the width of two
lanes. (Section 7C.6).
Guidance:
When the ``SCHOOL'' word markings are extended to the width of two
lanes, the characters should be 3 m (10 ft) or more in height. (Section
7C.6).
Option: The International Symbol of Access (ISA) parking space
markings may be placed in each parking space designated for use by
persons with disabilities. A blue background with a white border may
supplement the wheelchair symbol as shown in Figure 3-17.
Standard:
Where a through lane becomes a mandatory turn lane, lane-use arrow
markings shown in Figure 3-19 shall be used and accompanied by standard
signs.
The standard designs of lane use, lane reduction, and wrong way
arrow markings are shown and discussed in Figure 3-19.
Guidance:
Where a through lane becomes a mandatory turn lane, signs or
markings should be repeated as necessary to prevent entrapment and to
help the road user select the appropriate lane in advance of reaching a
queue of waiting vehicles.
Option: Lane-use arrow markings in Figure 3-19 may be used to
convey either guidance or mandatory messages.
The message marking ``ONLY'' may be used to supplement lane-use
arrow markings (Figures 3-18 and 3-20).
In situations where a lane reduction transition occurs, the lane
reduction arrow markings in Figure 3-19 may be used.
The wrong-way arrow markings in Figure 3-19 may be placed near the
downstream terminus of a ramp as shown in Figures 3-12(a) and 3-21(b).
This arrow indicates the correct direction of traffic flow to warn of
travel in the wrong direction.
A yield-ahead triangle symbol or ``YIELD AHEAD'' word pavement
markings may only be used in advance of intersections where approaching
traffic will encounter a YIELD sign. (See Figure 3-25).
Support:
Lane-use arrow markings are often used to provide guidance in turn
bays (Figure 3-20) where turns may or may not be mandatory and in two-
way left-turn lanes (Figure 3-3(a)).
Where crossroad channelization or ramp geometry do not make wrong-
way movements physically difficult, guidance to a potential wrong-way
road user can be provided by placing a lane-use arrow marking in each
lane of the ramp near the crossroad where it is clearly visible.
Option: word and symbol markings may include, but are not limited
to, the following: Other words or symbols may also be used under
certain conditions.
a. Regulatory
STOP
RIGHT (LEFT) TURN ONLY
40 KM/H (25 MPH)
Arrow Symbols
b. Warning
STOP AHEAD
YIELD AHEAD
YIELD AHEAD Triangle Symbol
SCHOOL X-ING
SINGAL AHEAD
PED X-ING
SCHOOL
R X R
c. Guide
US 40
STATE 135
ROUTE 40
Standard:
The word ``STOP'' shall not be used on the pavement unless
accompanied by a stop line (Section 3B.9) and STOP sign (Section 2B.4).
The word ``STOP'' shall not be placed on the pavement in advance of
a stop line, unless every vehicle is required to stop at all times.
The yield-ahead triangle symbol or ``YIELD AHEAD'' word pavement
marking shall not be used unless a YIELD sign (Section 2B.7) is in
place at the intersection. The yield-ahead symbol marking shall be as
shown in Figure 3-25.

[[Page 73638]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.008

[[Page 73639]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.009

[[Page 73640]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.010

[[Page 73641]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.011

[[Page 73642]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.012

[[Page 73643]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.013

[[Page 73644]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP30DE99.014

[[Page 73645]]

3B.13 Preferential Lane Word and Symbol Markings

Standard:
When a lane is assigned full or part time to a particular class or
classes of vehicles, preferential lane markings shall be used.
Signs or signals shall be used with preferential lane word or
symbol markings
All preferential lane word and symbol markings shall be white.
all preferential lane word and symbol markings shall be positioned
laterally in the center of the preferred-use lane.
Support:
Preferential lanes may be designated to identify a wide variety of
special uses. This could include, but is not limited to HOV (High
Occupancy Vehicle) lanes, bicycle lanes, bus only lanes, taxicab only
lanes, etc.
Standard:
Where a preferential lane use is established, the preferential lane
shall be marked with one of the following symbol or word markings for
the preferential lane use specified;
<bullet> HOV lane, the preferential lane use marking for HOV lanes
shall consist of white lines formed in a diamond shape. The diamond
shall be at least 750 mm (2.5 ft) wide and 3.6m (12 ft) in length. The
lines shall be at least 150 mm (6 in) in width.
<bullet> Bicycle lane; the preferential lane use marking for a
bicycle lane shall consist of a bicycle symbol or the word marking
``BIKE LANE.'' (See Section 9C, Markings, and Figures 9-4 through 9-9).
<bullet> Bus Only Lane; the preferential lane use markings for a
busses only lane shall consist of the word markings ``BUS ONLY'' (See
Section 3B.12).
<bullet> Taxi Only Lane; the preferential lane use marking for a
taxi only lane shall consist of the word markings ``TAXI ONLY'' (See
Section 3B.12).
<bullet> Other preferential lane use marking shall be identified in
accordance with Section 3B.12.
Guidance:
Engineering judgement should determine the need for supplemental
devices such as tubular markers, traffic cones, or flashing lights.
SUPPORT:
The spacing of the marking is an engineering judgement based on
prevailing speed, block lengths, distance form intersections and other
factors that affect clear communication to the road user. Markings
spaced as close as 24 m (80 ft) apart might be appropriate on city
streets, while markings spaced 300 m (1,000 ft) may be appropriate for
freeways.
The vehicle occupancy requirements established for an HOV lane may
be included in sequence after the diamond symbol. The word message
``HOV'' may be used in lieu of the diamond symbol.

3B.15 Curb Markings

Support:
Curb markings are most often used to indicate parking regulations
or to delineate the curb.
Standard:
Signs shall be used with curb markings those areas where curb
markings are frequently obliterated by snow and ice accumulation.
Where curbs are marked, the colors shall conform to the general
principles of markings (Section 3A.5).
Guidance:
When curb markings are used without signs to convey parking
regulations, a legible word marking regarding the regulation should be
placed on the curb. For example, ``No Parking,'' or ``No Standing.''
Retroreflective solid yellow marking should be placed on paved
median noses and the curbs of islands that are located in the line of
traffic flow where the paved median nose or the curb serves to channel
traffic to the right of the obstruction.
Retroreflective solid white marking should be used when traffic may
pass on either side of the island.
Option: Local authorities may prescribe special colors for curb
markings to supplement standard signs for parking regulation.
Support:
It is usually advisable to establish parking regulations by
installing standard signs (Sections 2B.31, 2B.32 and 2B.33) because
certain curb markings such as white and yellow curb markings are often
used only for curb delineation and visibility purposes.
Where the curbs of the islands become parallel to the direction of
traffic flow it is not necessary to mark the curbs unless an
engineering study indicates the need for this type of delineation.
Curbs at openings in a continuous median island need not be marked
unless an engineering study indicates the need for this type of
marking.

3B.16 Preferential Lane Longitudinal Markings for Motorized Vehicles

Standard:
Preferential lane longitudinal markings for motorized vehicles
shall be marked with the appropriate word or symbol pavement markings
in accordance with Section 3B.13.
Support:
Preferential lanes can take many forms depending on the level of
usage and the design of the facility. They may be physically separated
from the other travel lanes by a barrier, median, or painted neutral
area, or they may be concurrent with other travel lanes and be
separated only by longitudinal pavement markings. Further, physically
separated preferential lanes may operate in the same direction or be
reversible.
Preferential lane may be operated either full-time (24 hours per
day on all days), for extended periods of the day, or part-time
(restricted usage during specific hours on specified days).
Standard:
The following four sections are presented in tabular form in Table
3-2:
2. Physically separated, non-reversible preferential lane;
longitudinal pavement markings for preferential lane physically
separated from the other travel lanes by a barrier, median, or painted
neutral area shall consist of a single normal solid yellow line at the
left edge of the travel lane(s), a single normal solid white line at
the right edge of the travel lane(s), and if there are two or more
preferential lanes, the travel lanes shall be separated with a normal
broken white line. (See Figure 3.23a).
3. Physically separated, reversible preferential lane; longitudinal
pavement markings for preferential lane shall consist of a single
normal solid white line at both edges of the travel lane(s), and if
there are two or more preferential lanes, the travel lanes shall be
separated with a normal broken white line. (See Figure 3.23(a)).
4. Concurrent flow (left side) preferential lane; longitudinal
pavement markings for a full-time or part-time preferential lane on the
left side of the other traveled lanes, shall consist of a single normal
solid yellow line at the left edge of the preferential travel lane(s)
and one of the following at the right edge of the preferential travel
lane(s):
a. a double solid wide white line where crossing is prohibited; see
Figure 3-23(b);
b. a single solid wide white line where crossing is discouraged;
see Figure 3-23(c);

[[Page 73646]]

c. a single broken wide white line where crossing is permitted; see
Figure 3-23(d).
If there are two or more preferential lanes, the travel lanes shall
be separated with a normal broken white line.
4. Concurrent flow (right side) preferential lane; longitudinal
pavement markings for a full-time or part-time preferential lane on the
right of the other travel lanes, shall consist of a single normal solid
white line at the right edge of the preferential travel lane(s) if
warranted and one of the following at the left edge of the preferential
travel lane(s):
a. a double solid wide white line where crossing is prohibited; see
Figure 3-23(b);
b. a single solid wide white line where crossing is discouraged;
see Figure 3-23(c);
c. a single broken wide white line were crossing is permitted, see
Figure 3-23(d);
d. a single dotted normal white line where crossing is permitted by
any vehicle to perform a right turn maneuver; see Figure 3-23(e).
If there are two or more preferential lanes, the travel lanes shall
be separated with a normal broken white line.
Guidance:
When concurrent flow preferential lanes and other travel lanes are
separated by more than 1.2 m (4 ft) chevron markings should be placed
in the neutral area. The chevron spacing should be 30 m (100 ft) or
greater.
For full time or part-time concurrent flow preferential lanes, the
spacing or skip pattern of the single broken wide white line may be
reduced. The width of the single broken wide white line may also be
increased.

Table 3-2. Standard Lane Markings
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Types of preferential lane Longitudinal lane lines
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Left edge line Right edge line 2+ Lane centerline
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physically separated.............. Non-reversible...... Single normal solid yellow line.... Single normal solid white line..... Travel lanes shall
be separated with a
normal broken white
line
Reversible.......... Single normal solid white line at Single normal solid white line at
both edges. both edges.
Concurrent flow................... Left Side........... Single normal solid yellow line at A double solid wide white line
left edge. where crossing is prohibited; (See
Figure 3-23b)..
................................... A single solid wide white line
where crossing is discouraged;
(See Figure 2-23c)..
................................... A single broken wide white line
where crossing is permitted; (See
Figure 3-23e)..
Right Side.......... A double solid wide white line Single normal solid white line at
where crossing is prohibited; (See the right edge.
figure 3-23e)..
A single solid wide white line
where crossing is discouraged;
(See Figure 3-23e..
A single broken wide white line
where crossing is permitted; (See
Figure 3-23e)..
A single dotted normal white line
where c