Project Number: 216
Project Title: Visibility of Traffic Signal Displays for Aging and Color Deficient
Drivers
Project Chairman: Ed Miska
Project Submission Date: Sept 1993
Project Acceptance Date: Mar 1994 Progress Report Date: Sept 2001
Progress Report Number: 5
Estimated Completion Date: Sept 2001
Project Status | % Completed | |
---|---|---|
This Report | Last Report | |
1. Project Study Group |
100%
|
100%
|
2. Project Work Plan |
100%
|
100%
|
3. Project Research Study |
100%
|
100%
|
4. Project Alternatives |
100%
|
100%
|
5. Evaluation of Alternatives |
100%
|
100%
|
6. Draft Report |
100%
|
100%
|
7. Final Report |
50%
|
100%
|
8. Impact Statement |
0%
|
|
9. Educational Materials |
n/a
|
n/a
|
Project Title: Visibility
of Traffic Signal Displays for Aging and Colour Deficient Drivers
Date: September 6, 2001
1. Problem Description (Motivation):
Old age drivers and drivers with color vision deficiencies show difficulties in recognizing traffic signal colors. Research has indicated that the response time of these drivers is significantly longer than the normal population. The project designed to address the problem has evolved into two phases. Phase 1 of this project was to investigate the impact of improved signal head design (i.e., larger lenses, larger backboard and a reflective border) on the safety performance of all drivers. Phase 2 has evolved as an extension to Phase 1, increasing the conspicuity of the reflective border using standard backboards with 3M yellow diamond grade reflective tape at the along the outer edge.
2. Scope, Objectives, and Results:
Phase 1of this project was to field test and review a new signal design consisting of 3 - 300mm signal lenses and a backboard with an additional 75mm reflective border. The objective was to determine if the new signal design caused a reduction in driver’s reaction times, resulting in a reduction in traffic accidents at signalized intersections. The new signal design is expected to be effective in reducing rear-end accidents and, to a lesser degree, right angle and other miscellaneous intersection accident types. Ten intersections on major highway corridors in Burnaby, Maple Ridge, and Saanich were selected as test sites. The installation of the new traffic signals was completed on April 1, 1994. A safety performance evaluation of the effectiveness of the new signals was completed in 1996 and again in 1997. The results of Phase 1 of this project are as follows:
A new and related project was initiated by ICBC in the summer of 1998, which has been referred to as Phase 2. The project entitled, Safety Benefits of Improved Signal Backboard Visibility, aims to study the road safety performance impacts of highly reflective tape on signal head backboards. In September 1998, 3M diamond grade VIP reflective tape was placed on the outer edge of the backboards on the signals heads of six intersections located along McKenzie Avenue Expressway between the Patricia Bay Highway and the Trans Canada Highway in Saanich BC. The progress on this phase of the project is described below.
4. Project Results
This NCUTC Project (Project 216) has been continuing and evolving for over seven years with several reports generated to summarize the results. Four reports have been generated including the following:
Based on the results presented in these reports, the B.C. Ministry of Transportation has partnered with ICBC on a multi-year program to upgrade all primary signal displays to 300 mm lenses with yellow backboards with 3M VIP Diamond Grade reflective sheeting. As well, a number of B.C. municipalities have started using a reflective tape boarder around backboards. While the majority of applications have been of yellow tape on yellow backboards, there have been applications of white tape on black backboards. None of the municipalities stated that they had done before and after studies.
5. IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The installation of reflective tape on backboards reduced night-time crashes at intersections resulting in a safety benefit. The cost of applying this treatment at new installations or as a retro-fit is minimal (limited to four strips of tape per backboard and several minutes of staff time) when combined with regular signal construction or maintenance activities. The costs to retrofit a backboard with reflective tape for BC MoT $34.15. Hence for a large BC MoT intersection backboards for through movements and protected left turns (total of 12 backboards) the cost is $410. As backboard use in various agencies is dependent on local policy it is not possible to estimate the cross Canada however the BC costs should be representative since most of the cost is the tape itself.
6. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the MUTCD Section B3.2.3 Backboards be amended by the addition of the following:
The night-time visibility (conspicuousness) of traffic control signals may be enhanced by adding up to a 75 mm border of yellow prismatic retro-reflective sheeting, conforming to ASTM D4956-01 Type IX, around the outside edge of the backboard.
Submitted By:
(signature)
Ed Miska P.Eng., PTOE B.C. MoT.
(Please print name) (representing)
Accepted o Rejected o Returned for Revision o
Project Number (if accepted): 216 Project Chair: Ed Miska, P.Eng., PTOE
APPENDIX A
Effectiveness of Diamond Grade Yellow Tape on Signal Backboard
Preliminary Assessment of the McKenzie Corridor
(Revised
September 2001)
Effectiveness of Diamond Grade Yellow Tape on Signal Backboard
Preliminary Assessment of the McKenzie Corridor
(Revised September 2001)
In September of 1998, diamond grade yellow tape was placed along the outer edge of the backboards of signal heads at all signalized intersections along McKenzie Avenue from the Patricia Bay Highway to the Trans Canada Highway in Saanich. This was done in an attempt to frame the signal heads and make them more visible to motorists with the intent of improving intersection safety at night. The type of accident that is likely to benefit from the improvement is rear end accidents.
The location of the study was along McKenzie Avenue from the Patricia Bay Highway to the Trans Canada Highway. There were six intersections in the study area. The intersections involved were:
The accident data used in the study was obtained from the Saanich Police Department. One year of nighttime accident data was supplied for the before improvement period and 3 years for the after improvement period. The before improvement period is from October 1997 to September 1998 and the after improvement period is from October 1998 to July 2001. Nighttime accidents were determined by the Saanich Police Department and were based on the time of day and the month in which they occurred. Only accidents that occurred during the following periods of time were considered nighttime accidents:
Month | Time |
---|---|
January to March |
1700-0800
|
April to June |
2000-0500
|
July to September |
2100-0500
|
October to December |
1700-0800
|
The two tables below summarize the findings. The first table lists the before and after accidents by intersection and the second table lists the accidents by primary accident types.
Intersection |
Before Improvement (Oct 1997 to Sept 1998) |
1st year after Improvement (Oct 1998 to Sept 1999) |
2nd year after Improvement (Oct 1999 to Sept 2000) |
3rd year
after Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rte 17 N/B Off-Ramp (Douglas Street and McKenzie Avenue) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Rte 17 S/B Off-Ramp at McKenzie Avenue |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Glanford Avenue and McKenzie Avenue |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
Carey Road and McKenzie Avenue |
3 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
West Burnside Road and McKenzie Avenue |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Highway 1 and McKenzie Avenue/Admirals Road |
6 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
Total |
14 |
14 |
5 |
3 |
Table 2: Total Night Accidents by Primary Accident Type
Primary Accident Type |
Before Improvement (Oct 1997 to Sept 1998) |
1st year after Improvement (Oct 1998 to Sept 1999) |
2nd year after Improvement (Oct 1999 to Sept 2000) |
3rd year after Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intersection 90 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
Left Turn |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Right Turn |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Rear End |
7 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
Overtaking |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Off Road |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Unknown |
2 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
Total |
14 |
14 |
5 |
3 |
The total number of accidents the year after the improvement was the same as the previous year, but the second year after the improvement showed a reduction in accidents from 14 to 5 and the third year shows a reduction to 3. When looking at the primary causes of the accidents a significant improvement can be seen in rear end accidents. In the year prior to the improvements there were 7 rear end accidents, 2 in the year after the improvement, 3 in the 2nd year, and 0 in the 3rd year.
The traffic volume along the corridor has remained relatively consistent from 1998-2001. The following table details the traffic volume for the 4 years.
Year | AADT |
---|---|
1998 |
22,730 |
1999 |
23,184 |
2000 |
23,648 |
2001 |
24,120 |
Police Opinion
The Saanich Police Department did not notice any differences in terms of safety or motorist behavior as a result of the improvements.
Benefit/Cost Calculation
Cost of Tape |
$30.60 / backboard |
Cost of Labour |
$3.55 / backboard |
Maximum number of backboards / signalized intersection |
12 |
Number of signalized intersection in BC |
530 |
Material Cost for all signalized intersections in BC |
$194,616 |
Labour Cost for all signalized intersections in BC |
$ 22,578 |
Taxes |
$ 15,204 |
Total Material and Labour Cost |
$232,398 |
Total Material and Labour Cost / Year (Assuming 10 year service life) |
$ 23,240 |
Accident Type |
Total Accidents |
ARF (%) |
ICBC Collision Costs |
Estimated Savings / Year |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fatal |
1 |
30 |
$282,000 |
$7,050 |
Injury |
188 |
30 |
$44,000 |
$206,800 |
PDO |
192 |
30 |
$5,000 |
$24,000 |
Total |
|
|
$237,850 |
Notes
Benefit/Cost Ratio = 10
Feedback from the Saanich Police Department indicated that no differences in driver behavior were noticed before and after the improvement in backboard visibility. The accident totals between the year before and the year after the application of the tape to the backboard were the same, but decreased the following years.
A reduction was seen in rear end accidents from the year before the initiation of the improvement in all years following the improvement. Rear end accidents decreased from seven before the improvement to only two, three and none in the years after. This is an encouraging sign since rear end accidents are the primary accident type that should benefit the most from the improvement. Other accident types such as left/right turn accidents are caused primarily due to a judgment error in determining a suitable gap and the use of diamond grade tape on the signal backboard would not affect the judgement of the motorist. Since the sample size is small, it is not possible to have a statistically significant result. Now that the Ministry has adopted the reflective borders as a standard for backboards there will shortly be a much larger sample size for analysis.
Another benefit of using reflective tape is that during a power failure the reflective tape will still frame the signal and drivers will be more likely to recognize the situation and treat the intersection as a four way stop.
The use of using diamond
grade yellow tape at signalized intersections appears to have a safety benefit
at minimal cost albeit that the results are based on a small sample size. However
due to the low cost involved ($34/ backboard or for the largest BC MoT intersection
with 12 backboards $410) and based on the reduction in rear end accidents seen
along the McKenzie corridor, it is recommended that the Ministry apply diamond
grade tape to all signal backboards. The application of the diamond grade tape
should be incorporated into the maintenance of the signal heads and should be
applied at the same time that the signal bulbs are replaced. The use of fluorescent
diamond grade tape should also be considered as it may have the added benefit
of reducing accidents in the daytime as well as at night.